Legal Opinion

United States v. Anderson

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided July 23, 1946No. Civil Action 154PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORDBYE, District Judge.

The relevant and material facts may be ’ summarized as follows: The United States of America, plaintiff herein, owns and possesses through the Federal Housing Administration a valid promissory note signed by Charles Anderson and his wife, Gerda Anderson. Both Andersons died early in 1941, and no payments have been made on the note since their deaths. The final decrees of distribution have been made for the estates of both Andersons. The probate proceedings have been closed. The Government filed no claim against either estate during the four-month period allowed for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Waterman v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Borer v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. In Re Estate of PaulsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Vibradamp CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1966
  2. States v. SwansonDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1947
  3. United States v. LuceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1948
  4. United States v. SnyderDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API