United States v. Luce
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
NORDBYE, District Judge.
On this motion the following facts seem pertinent. It is the claim of the Government in its complaint that one Earl D. Luce during his lifetime was an employee of the Office for Emergency Management, Office *242of Civilian Defense, an agency of the United States, from August, 1942, to January, 1943; that he became indebted to the United States by reason of overpayment made him by the Government during this period of service on account of per diem and other expenses incident to travel performed as such employee. It appears that on or about July 2, 1946, the Government wrote…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Seaman Field v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1834
- United States v. First Huntington Nat. BankDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1940
- United States v. PateDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1942
- United States v. AndersonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. BootsDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1987
- United States v. McBrideAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
- United States v. BigalkDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2009