Legal Opinion
United States v. Vibradamp Corporation
District Court, S.D. California
Decided September 7, 1966No. Civ. 65-792PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
GRAY, District Judge.
All of the defendants in this action have moved to dismiss the Government’s amended complaint for various reasons that will be discussed in this memorandum. The matter has been argued and submitted for decision. The facts are as follows:
In 1951, Frank and Walter Muller were principal owners of Vibradamp Corporation, which company sought and obtained, on March 31, 1951, a manufacturing contract from the Department of the Navy. As an inducement to the Navy to execute the contract, Frank Muller, acting for himself and his brother Walter, gave…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Burnett v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Waterman v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Borer v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re Peter Gottheiner, Bankrupt. United States of America v. Peter GottheinerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Contract Buyers League v. F & F INVESTMENTDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1969
- Leigh v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
- In Re Estate of Denman, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2008
- United States v. BlumenfeldDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.