Legal Opinion

United States v. Snyder

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 30, 1962No. Civ. A. No. 25880PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN W. LORD, Jr., District Judge.

Both parties have filed motions for summary judgment. The facts are uncontroverted. Philip S. Neison, the decedent, was separated from his employment on the Pennsylvania Railroad on January 31, 1941. Pursuant to § 2(c) (1) of the Railroad Retirement Act of 1937, he applied for and was granted an annuity. The Act specifies that an employee shall “be eligible for annuities after they shall have ceased to render compensated service to any person.” 45 U.S.C.A. § 228b(a).

Philip Neison received annuity payments from February 1, 1941 to October 31, 1943 in the sum…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Waterman v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. Minnie Viles, Administratrix of the Estate of Cloyd H. Viles, Deceased Harvey Viles Inez Viles Whaley Minnie Viles v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
  5. United States v. WeisburnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Garcia v. Island Program Designer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. Westchester Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  3. Garcia v. Island ProgramCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API