Pam's Carpet Service, Inc. v. Employment Division
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.
Petitioner appeals from a referee’s decision that 11 persons who installed carpet and other products for petitioner over a two-year, nine-month period were petitioner’s employes, not independent contractors, and that therefore petitioner was liable for unemployment compensation taxes on the amounts paid to the installers during that period.
This case is before us for the fourth time. Its history illustrates the development of this area of the law and defines the issues now before us.
In March, 1978, a notice of deficiency assessment was served on petitioner, alleging that petitioner had failed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kirkpatrick v. PeetOregon Supreme Court · 1967
- Byrne Trucking, Inc. v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Pam's Carpet Service, Inc. v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Republic Development Co. v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Republic Development Co. v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Petersen v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Carpet Remnant Warehouse, Inc. v. New Jersey Department of LaborSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
- Carpet Remnant Warehouse, Inc. v. New Jersey Department of LaborSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991