Legal Opinion

Kirkpatrick v. Peet

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1967PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This is an appeal by J. N. Peet, Department of Employment Commissioner, from a decree of the Circuit Court for Marion County declaring that plaintiff was not an employer subject to the Unemployment Insurance Act (ORS Ch 657). The decree reversed the Department’s decision that the services performed by certain individuals for plaintiff constituted employment within the meaning of ORS Ch 657.

Plaintiff is the distributor for Kirby vacuum cleaners and accessories in Benton and Linn Counties. The merchandise was sold through the efforts of door-to-door salesmen. The Department contends that an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baker v. CameronOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Singer Sewing MacHine Co. v. State Unemployment Compensation CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Rahoutis v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  4. State Unemployment Compensation Commission v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. State Unemployment Compensation Commission v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Narragansett Wire Co. v. NorbergSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
  3. Wallis v. Secretary of Kansas Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  4. Standard Chemical Manufacturing Co. v. Employment Security DivisionMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Employment Security Commission of Wyoming v. Laramie Cabs, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1985

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API