Legal Opinion
Carpet Remnant Warehouse, Inc. v. New Jersey Department of Labor
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided August 6, 1991Published
1Opinion of the Court
125 N.J. 567 (1991)
593 A.2d 1177
CARPET REMNANT WAREHOUSE, INC., PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued March 11, 1991.
Decided August 6, 1991.
Steven E. Angstreich argued the cause for appellant (Levy, Angstreich, Finney, Mann & Burkett, attorneys; Frederick W. Hardt, on the brief).
Lewis A. Scheindlin, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General of New Jersey).
The opinion of the Court was delivered by STEIN, J.
The issue in this appeal is whether carpet installers who…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Steward MacHine Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Mayflower Securities Co. v. Bureau of SecuritiesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.