Petersen v. Employment Department
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.
Petitioner Austin Petersen, dba A Austin Stop Plumbing, seeks review of an order of an Employment Department referee affirming an assessment of unemployment taxes. He challenges, in particular, a determination that three individuals who performed “outcall” plumbing services resulting in remuneration to his business were neither independent contractors nor engaged in an “independently established business,” ORS 657.040(1), and, thus, were petitioner’s employees for purposes of unemployment tax liability. We reverse in part and remand for reconsideration.
Petitioner, a licensed plumbing…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Fifth Avenue Corp. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Kirkpatrick v. PeetOregon Supreme Court · 1967
- Oregon Business Planning Council v. Department of Land Conservation & DevelopmentOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Republic Development Co. v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Fedex Ground Package System, Inc., Employment Practices LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2009
- Chard v. Beauty-N-Beast SalonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Limon v. CamachoSupreme Court of The Commonwealth of The Northern Mariana Islands · 1996
- Petersen v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995