Legal Opinion

Griggs v. Port of Tacoma

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1928No. 21646. En BancPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

On September 10, 1928, the port commission of the port of Tacoma adopted a resolution, numbered 233, appropriating thirty-five thousand dollars of the general fund of the port of Tacoma, or so much thereof as might be necessary, to be used to dredge and improve Hylebos creek waterway by straightening, widening and deepening it.

Respondent, a resident and taxpayer in the port district of the port of Tacoma, conceiving himself to be injured by the proceeding, began suit against the port commission and the port district to restrain the expenditure of any of this money, setting forth the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Port of Everett v. Everett Improvement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
  2. State ex rel. Huggins v. BridgesWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. State ex rel. Hill v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Schwager-Nettleton Mills v. CarstensWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  5. State ex rel. Hill v. BridgesWashington Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pacific First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Washington Education Ass'n v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Commercial Waterway District No. 1 v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Hughbanks v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Washington Education Ass'n v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API