Legal Opinion

Hughbanks v. Port of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1938No. 26891. Department TwoPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

On his own behalf as a resident taxpayer within the boundaries of the port district of Seattle, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, plaintiff instituted this action against the port of Seattle and its commissioners to enjoin the construction of certain improveiiients proposed by the port commission in its resolution No. 917, in certain units of its comprehensive scheme of harbor improvement, and from issuing and selling $2,300,000 of its general serial bonds for the purpose of providing funds to be used in payment for the improvements in question. Trial to the court resulted in a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Port of Everett v. Everett Improvement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Griggs v. Port of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Donworth v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sane Transit v. Sound TransitWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Sane Transit v. Sound TransitWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Merkel v. Port of BrownsvilleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API