Legal Opinion
Ruszin v. Commonwealth, Department of Labor & Industry, Bureau of Workers' Compensation
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 22, 1996PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PELLEGRINI, Judge.
Before us are cross motions for summary judgment in this declaratory judgment action brought in our original jurisdiction. At issue are whether Petitioners must pursue their administrative remedies before they can maintain this action and, if they need not, are there questions of material fact precluding the grant of summary judgment.
As part of a number of amendments made to the Workers’ Compensation Act1 by the Act of February 22, 1995, P.L. (Spec.Sess.) _, (Act 1), Section 306(c)(8), 77 P.S. § 513, was amended to reduce the time for filing of workmen’s compensation claims…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Washington Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Gulnac v. South Butler County School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Parker v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- South Whitehall Township v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Boeing Helicopter Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- M.J. Brouillette v. T. Wolf, GovernorCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Pennsylvania State Lodge v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Commonwealth, Department of General Services v. Board of ClaimsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Alaica v. RidgeCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Berninger v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.