Legal Opinion

Parker v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 31, 1988No. 583 C.D. 1987PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Barry,

This is a class action within our original jurisdiction seeking a declaratory judgment on the constitutionality of Section 402.5 of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 1 as well as an injunction against the further appli cation of said statute. The petitioners are Pearlie M. Parker, Wayne Stine and Leonard Spielman, who bring this action on behalf of themselves and all workers who have been determined to be or may, in the future, be determined to be seasonal workers in the fruit and vegetable food processing industry. 2 The respondents are the Department of Labor and…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. HodorySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Laudenberger v. Port Auth. of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Association of Texas Professional Educators v. KirbyTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Pennsylvania School Boards Ass'n v. Commonwealth Ass'n of School AdministratorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Common Cause of Pennsylvania v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Beers v. UNEMP. COMP. BD. OF REVIEWSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Ruszin v. Commonwealth, Department of Labor & Industry, Bureau of Workers' CompensationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API