Legal Opinion

People v. Mintz

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 27, 1930No. Docket No. 17PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STROTHER, J., pro tem.

The appellants were charged, in the first count of the information, with a violation of the provisions of section 403a of the Penal Code; in the second count, with a conspiracy to violate the provisions of that section. The defendant Tetta Stromberg was found guilty upon the first count, and all of the defendants appealing were found guilty upon the second count. Prom the judgments upon conviction these defendants appeal.

The part of section 403a necessary to be considered in passing upon the questions raised by the appeal, reads as follows:

“Any person who displays a red…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. SteelikCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. People v. Ong Mon FooCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. People v. MontgomeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. People v. OlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. People v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. People v. ImmonenMichigan Supreme Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API