People v. Mintz
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
STROTHER, J., pro tem.
The appellants were charged, in the first count of the information, with a violation of the provisions of section 403a of the Penal Code; in the second count, with a conspiracy to violate the provisions of that section. The defendant Tetta Stromberg was found guilty upon the first count, and all of the defendants appealing were found guilty upon the second count. Prom the judgments upon conviction these defendants appeal.
The part of section 403a necessary to be considered in passing upon the questions raised by the appeal, reads as follows:
“Any person who displays a red…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. SteelikCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- People v. Ong Mon FooCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
3Cited by9 opinions
- Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- People v. MontgomeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- People v. OlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- People v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- People v. ImmonenMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.