Legal Opinion
Rollins v. Vidmar
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided October 2, 1985No. 2 CA-CIV 5417PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Presiding Judge.
Whether the trial court erred in dismissing plaintiffs contract claim against defendant for lack of personal jurisdiction is the issue presented on this appeal. We find that it did and reverse.
Plaintiff, Laura S. Rollins, is the mothi^ of defendant, Margo Vidmar, former wife of defendant/appellee Michael J. Vidmar. Rollins is a resident of Arizona and the Vidmars are residents of California. In September of 1981, while the Vidmars were still married, Rollins, while visiting relatives in Illinois, received a phone call from her daughter, Margo, requesting money…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Manufacturers' Lease Plans, Inc. v. Alverson Draughon CollegeArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- Barer v. GoldbergCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Meyers v. Hamilton Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Mitchell v. American Reserve InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Davis v. Metro Productions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Cameron v. BurkeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- Corporate Investment Business Brokers v. MelcherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- China Express, Inc. v. Volpi & Son Machine Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- O'Connor, Cavanagh, Anderson, Westover, Killingsworth & Beshears, P.A. v. Bonus Utah, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.