Legal Opinion

China Express, Inc. v. Volpi & Son Machine Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 24, 1987PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Sullivan, J.

China Express, Inc., an Arizona corporation engaged in the manufacture and sale of Oriental foodstuffs, sued Volpi & Son Machine Corp., a New York corporation not qualified to do business in Arizona, in the Superior Court of Arizona for breach of contract and fraudulent conversion arising out of Volpi & Son’s failure to deliver a noodle processing machine and to refund the $8,000 which China Express had paid toward its purchase price. The summons and complaint were served by registered mail, and Volpi & Son failed to appear or answer. After inquest, the Arizona…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rolls-Royce Motors, Inc. v. Charles Schmitt & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  2. Schomann International Corp. v. Northern Wireless, Ltd.District Court, N.D. New York · 1999
  3. Burrows Paper Corp. v. R.G. Engineering, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2005
  4. Creative Socio-Medics, Corp. v. City of RichmondDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002
  5. Glass Contractors, Inc. v. Target Supply & Display, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API