Legal Opinion

O'Connor, Cavanagh, Anderson, Westover, Killingsworth & Beshears, P.A. v. Bonus Utah, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 18, 1988No. 2 CA-CV 88-0006PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HATHAWAY, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment granting appellee Bonus Utah, Inc.’s (Bonus) motion to quash, and dismissal of appellant O’Connor, Cavanagh, Anderson, Westover, Killingsworth & Beshears, P.A.’s (O’Con-nor) action for breach of contract. The sole issue raised on appeal is whether Bonus, a Utah corporation also doing business in Nevada, has subjected itself to jurisdiction in Arizona pursuant to Ariz.R.Civ.P., 4(e)(2), 16 A.R.S., 1 by contracting with appellant for legal services to be performed in Arizona. The trial court determined that Arizona lacks personal…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Aries v. Palmer Johnson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  5. Houghton v. Piper Aircraft CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Bell Atlantic-West Virginia, Inc. v. RansonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Lane v. Boston Scientific Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Prete v. LeporeDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1989
  4. Williams v. Lakeview Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  5. State Ex Rel. Bell Atlantic-West Virginia, Inc. v. RansonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API