Legal Opinion
Meyers v. Hamilton Corp.
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided December 19, 1984No. 17627-PRPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Justice.
This is a petition for review of a memorandum decision of Division One of the Court of Appeals affirming an order of the Maricopa County Superior Court granting defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-120.24 and Rule 23, Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17A A.R.S.
The issues presented for review are:
1. Did the defendant cause an event to occur in this state out of which the claim arose?
2. If so, did the defendant have sufficient minimum contacts with Arizona to justify the assertion by an Arizona…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Charles J. Brainerd v. The Governors of the University of Alberta J. Peter Meekison Eugene S. Lechelt Pamela JarvisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Batton v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Robert a Hansen Family Trust v. Fgh Industries, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- Corporate Investment Business Brokers v. MelcherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Rollin v. William v. Frankel & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.