Legal Opinion

People v. Pico

California Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1882No. 10,754PublishedCited by 44 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of conviction and from an order denying a new trial, in the Superior Court of the County of Santa Clara. Belder, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Myrick J.:

The defendant was by information accused of grand larceny, in that he “ did feloniously take and steal one roan horse,” the property of one S. P. Stockton. The plea was not guilty. The defendant was convicted as charged.

1. It appears from the bill of exceptions that on the trial the people gave evidence tending to prove that the defendant took from the Normal School grounds in San Jose, a roan mare, harness and buggy, belonging to S. P. Stockton, and after using the same in the public streets of San Jose, and declaring that the mare belonged to one Archer, left the harness and buggy…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. M'DonellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. People v. SuesserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. State v. LewisNevada Supreme Court · 1889
  3. People v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. People v. MetheverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. State v. BrassfieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1925

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API