Legal Opinion

Kockelman v. Segal

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 7, 1998No. H016390PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, J.

In this wrongful death action, Valerie Kockelman alleged that psychiatrist Dr. Jonathan Segal and the Palo Alto Medical Foundation for Health Care, Research and Education, were negligent in treating her husband, William Kockelman, for his chronic depression, and that this negligence was a proximate cause of her husband’s suicide. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of defendants, finding as a matter of law that there was no duty owed to the decedent because he was being treated as an outpatient rather than in a hospital setting. We have concluded…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.California Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Ballard v. UribeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Weirum v. RKO General, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1975

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Giraldo v. Department of Corrections & RehabilitationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Lawson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Rotolo v. San Jose Sports & Entertainment, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Lenoci v. LeonardSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  5. Pirozzi v. Apple Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API