Legal Opinion
Pirozzi v. Apple Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 20, 2012No. Case No. 12-CV-01529 YGRPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order Granting Motion of Apple Inc. to Dismiss With Leave to Amend
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Maria Pirozzi brings this putative class action against Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”) for failing to prevent third-party software applications distributed through its online App Store from uploading user information from their mobile devices without permission. Plaintiff asserts six claims against Apple: (1) Violations of California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), Cal. Bus. & Prof.Code §§ 17200 et seq.; (2) Violations of California’s False Advertising Law (“FAL”), Cal. Bus. &…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Brazil v. Dole Food Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
- Opperman v. Path, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- In re EpipenDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2018
- Pirozzi v. Apple, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
- Bruton v. Gerber Products Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.