Dobbins v. City of Arcadia
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Prank G. Pinlayson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
In this action plaintiff sought recovery of damages alleged to have been sustained as the result of the negligent acts of the city trustees and city engineer of the city of Arcadia.
Upon findings made, it was adjudged that plaintiff recover as against defendant Ehle, who was the city engineer, and take nothing as to defendants Charles A. Billings, J. W. Barnes, A. L. Parker, H. M. Roth, and James A. Stoker, who were trustees of the city, from which part of the judgment adverse to plaintiff he appeals upon the judgment-roll.
In substance, the findings upon which appellant claims the judgment…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Davoust v. City of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Doeg v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Brunson v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Brown v. WestSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1910
- Merritt v. McFarlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ham v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Strickfaden v. Greencreek Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
- Whiteman v. Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Hilton v. OliverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Baisley v. HenryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.