Legal Opinion
Industrial Recision Services v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 17, 2002PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge FRIEDMAN.
Industrial Recision Services (Employer) petitions for review of the March 27, 2002, order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB), which affirmed the decision of the workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) to grant Anthony Farbo’s (Claimant) claim petition. We affirm.
On October 12, 1998, Claimant injured his right knee after he slipped on coolant leaking from a machine while following his supervisor at work. Claimant received emergency room treatment of his right knee and returned to work the next day. Claimant filed claim and penalty petitions against the Employer…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lewis v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Cromie v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Baierl Chevrolet v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Bisesi v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Penske Logistics v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Lusby v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Excalibur Management ServicesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- P. DiLaqua v. City of Philadelphia Fire Dept. (WCAB)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.