Legal Opinion

Lusby v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 9, 2009No. 804 C.D. 2008PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.

This workers’ compensation appeal is currently a dispute between two insurance companies about which one must recoup duplicate payments to medical providers. Liability to William Lusby (Claimant) is fully satisfied. The Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) ruled in favor of Claimant’s private insurer, Highmark, now represented by Claimant’s lawyer. The Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) ruled in favor of the workers’ compensation insurer. To resolve this dispute, we must decide whether Highmark’s sub-rogation lien was sufficiently established in prior proceedings…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lehigh County Vo-Tech School v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. North Penn Sanitation, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Public School Bldg. Auth. v. QuandelCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Industrial Recision Services v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Commonwealth, Department of Labor & Industry v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Phila. v. W. Deloatch and Independence Blue Cross (WCAB); Independece Blue Cross v. City of Phila. and W. Deloatch (WCAB)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  2. J&S Technology Solutions, Inc. v. W. Gonzalez (WCAB)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2026
  3. W. Wheatley v. Pyramid Hotel Group (WCAB)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API