Legal Opinion

Hendrix v. Linn-Corriher Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 17, 1985No. 8510IC276PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

Appellant, Linn-Corriher Corporation, contends that the evidence in the record does not support the findings of fact underlying the conclusion of law that plaintiff is disabled. In order to support a conclusion of disability, the Commission must find:(1) that plaintiff was incapable after his injury of earning the same wages he had earned before his injury in the same employment, (2) that plaintiff was incapable after his injury of earning the same wages he had earned before his injury in any other employment, and (3) that this individual’s incapacity to earn was caused…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Ashley v. Rent-A-Car CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Sebastian v. Mona Watkins Hair StylingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Lucas v. Burlington IndustriesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hendrix v. Linn-Corriher Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Preslar v. Cannon Mills Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API