Lucas v. Burlington Industries
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge.
Plaintiff first argues that the Commission erred in setting aside the hearing commissioner’s conclusion of law that plaintiff suffered from an occupational disease without reaching its own conclusion on the issue. We disagree. The dispositive question is whether plaintiff’s capacity to earn wages has been diminished. Mills v. J. P. Stevens & Co., 53 N.C. App. 341, 280 S.E. 2d 802 (1981). In the present cause, the Commission considered plaintiff’s physical symptoms and found that she may have had bronchitis in part due to cotton dust exposure. It also found, however, that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Little v. Anson County Schools Food ServiceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Mabe v. North Carolina Granite CorporationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- Buck v. Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Sebastian v. Mona Watkins Hair StylingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Mills v. JP Stevens & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fleming v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Hendrix v. Linn-Corriher Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Preslar v. Cannon Mills Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Fleming v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Hendrix v. Linn-Corriher Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.