Legal Opinion

Sebastian v. Mona Watkins Hair Styling

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 20, 1979No. 7810IC235PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

The Industrial Commission found that plaintiff’s skin condition was compensable as an occupational disease under G.S. § 97-53(13) and awarded her medical expenses plus temporary total disability benefits for a period of thirty days. Defendants did not challenge this conclusion or award and thus no question is presented with respect to it. The Commission, in its Order, stated that “plaintiff has failed to show that her disability after January 31, 1977, was caused by her occupational disease.” Plaintiff has excepted to the conclusion based thereon that “[p]laintiff has no…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mabe v. North Carolina Granite CorporationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Henry v. A. C. Lawrence Leather Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Singleton v. D. T. Vance Mica Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Tyndall v. Walter Kidde & Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Schober v. Mountain Bell TelephoneNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Mills v. JP Stevens & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Nix v. Collins & Aikman, Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API