Legal Opinion
State v. Klinger
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 1, 1998No. AC 16220PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HEALEY, J.
This appeal arises out of the trial court’s denial on May 13,1996, of the defendant’s pro se motion for a modification of a condition of his probation, i.e., restitution.1 On October 21, 1992, the defendant, pursuant to a plea bargain,2 pleaded nolo contendere to one count of larceny in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-124 and one count of engaging in the real estate business without a license in violation of General Statutes § 20-325. On the first count, the trial court sentenced the defendant to a term of five years with execution suspended and placed…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Loisel v. RoweSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Reynolds v. VroomSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. BurtonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. GibsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- State v. ArpiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Edgewood Village, Inc. v. Housing AuthorityConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- State v. KelleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.