Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Orrell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 30, 1949PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

The plaintiff is relying on a specific written contract between himself and the defendant on which to recover from the latter the commission he claims. The evidence, dehors the document, would hardly establish the relation of agency between the plaintiff and the defendant at all. Agency is the product of a mutual agreement. It is a situation which cannot be forced on a person in invitum, and no presump tion or inference of agency arises from the fact that a realtor, with a buying client, has contacted a person willing to sell, and has consummated the sale. the defendant bad not listed bis…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. WeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
  2. Craig v. KessingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Harben v. HuttonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
  4. State v. LusterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. LusterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API