Craig v. Kessing
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Justice.
We conclude that the decision rendered by the Court of Appeals is correct and we affirm the decision. However, there is one principle of law alluded to in the Court of Appeals opinion that we think should be clarified.
In part III of its opinion the Court of Appeals held that the conclusions of law made by the trial court were not supported by sufficient findings of fact or by the evidence contained in the record. Conclusion (a) states that “(t)he instrument was not completed at the time of execution by Jonas Kessing”. In commenting on this conclusion the Court of Appeals said:
Co…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Neal v. MarroneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Bowden v. BowdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Johnson v. OrrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
3Cited by21 opinions
- Cunningham v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Vestal v. VestalCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Smith v. Central Soya of Athens, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1985
- Citrini v. GoodwinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Town of West Jefferson v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.