State v. Luster
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MEYER, Justice.
Both of the cases before us involve the delivery and sale of the particular stolen automobile to a police-organized “sting” or undercover fencing operation. The issue before this Court in each case concerns the defense of entrapment —in Case No. 79CRS28603, whether the trial judge, though he gave an instruction on entrapment, erred in not instructing on entrapment by an agent, and in Case No. 79CRS22551, whether the trial judge erred in refusing to give an instruction on the general defense of entrapment. We find no error and affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.
The main…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. FletcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. DionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- State v. CannonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Commonwealth v. TraceyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- State v. SandersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Bowman v. Cox Toyota ScionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.