Seligman v. Tucker
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REPPY, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment for a final mandatory injunction requiring defendants to remove or lower an addition to a single-family residence, for attorney’s fees, and for court costs.
The facts which give meaning to certain concessions of defendants and to their contentions are as follows:
Around February 1963 Bensonia Investment Company acquired a 37-vacant-lot subdivision in a hillside area of Sherman Oaks, California, for the speculative purpose of constructing single-family residences to be sold to the public. The slope of the hills was from higher land at the south…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Go-Bart Importing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Lorenson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Hannula v. Hacienda Homes, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1949
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- McDonough v. WW Snow Construction Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1973
- Guntert v. City of StocktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Sain v. SilvestreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Eisen v. Tavangarian, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- ZABRUCKY v. McAdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.