Legal Opinion
Eisen v. Tavangarian
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided June 20, 2019No. B278271PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPerluss, P. J.
*629Following a bench trial the court entered judgment and granted an injunction in favor of Glenn Eisen and Alison Eisen, finding that Ardeshir Tavangarian, Tania Tavangarian and 619 Properties, LLC had violated the view protection provisions of paragraphs 1 and 11 of the covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&R's) applicable to the parties' neighboring properties in the Marquez Knolls section of the Pacific Palisades. The court ordered removal of certain alterations and improvements made by the Tavangarians to their home, now owned by 619 Properties, and awarded the Eisens $ 39,000 in…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Carma Developers (California), Inc. v. Marathon Development California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
- Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Marggieh Dicarlo v. Moneylion, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Amaro v. WeberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
- City of Hesperia v. Lake Arrowhead Community Services Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2023
- Colyear v. Rolling Hills Community Assn. of Rancho Palos VerdesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
- Lent v. Cal. Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.