Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Anthracite Coal Antitrust Litigation

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 23, 1979No. M.D.L. No. 293PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MUIR, District Judge.

These related anthracite coal antitrust actions have been assigned to the undersigned judge for the purpose of conducting pre-trial proceedings. On February 1,1979, Plaintiffs filed a motion for sanctions against Defendants Reading Anthracite Coal Company, Reading Anthracite Company, and Lehigh Valley Coal Sales Company (the Reading Defendants) accompanied by a memorandum and filed a similar motion for sanctions against Defendants Greenwood Stripping Corp., Greenwood Mining Company, Lehigh Navigation-Dodson, and Pocono Fuels, Inc. (the Greenwood Defendants). On…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Spevack v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. George Campbell Painting Corp. v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Securities and Exchange Commission v. American Beryllium & Oil Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. James Traficant, Jr. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  2. Traficant v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
  3. Johnson v. Missouri Board of Nursing AdministratorsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Dunkin' Donuts Inc. v. TaseskiDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
  5. United States v. Massachusetts Industrial Finance AgencyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API