Legal Opinion

United States v. Massachusetts Industrial Finance Agency

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided July 7, 1995No. Civ. A. No. 94-30017 MAPPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER OF COURT ON PLAINTIFF UNITED STATES’ MOTION TO BAR MIFA FROM PRESENTING EVIDENCE RELATING TO UNANSWERED RULE 30(b)(6) QUESTIONS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO COMPEL MIFA TO DESIGNATE A KNOWLEDGEABLE RULE 30(b)(6) WITNESS (Docket No. 48), AND UNITED STATES’MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS (Docket No. 50)

NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

Counsel for Plaintiff United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor New England Adolescent Research Institute, Inc. (“NEARI”), and Defendant Massachusetts Industrial Finance Agency (“MIFA”) appeared…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance v. ButcherDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1986
  4. Chubb Integrated Systems Ltd. v. National BankDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1984
  5. Resolution Trust Corporation, in Its Capacity as Receiver of First Bankers Trust and Savings Association, F.A. v. Southern Union Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. TaylorDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1996
  2. Louisiana Pacific Corp. v. Money Market 1 Institutional Investment DealerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
  3. Great American Insurance v. Vegas Construction Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 2008
  4. Alexander v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
  5. In re Vitamins Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API