Legal Opinion

Reed v. Hunter

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1935PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

The question herein is whether the letter of the claim agent of the State Industrial Accident Commission, dated March 26, 1934, and addressed to the attorney for the claimant herein, was an appealable order.

The plaintiff cites Meaney v. State Industrial Accident Commission, 113 Or. 371 (227 P. 305, 232 P. 789). The doctrine of that case is that the right of appeal was not limited to the final action of the commission on the original application hut extended to any subsequent final action of the commission upon an application for allowance based upon aggravation of the injury or the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Meaney v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Jackson v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Miller v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Monahan v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. State Compensation DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969
  2. Place v. FRIESEN LUMBER COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Place v. FRIESEN LUMBER COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API