Legal Opinion

Monahan v. State Industrial Accident Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

The pleadings before us are the complaint, the answer and the plaintiff’s demurrer .to the latter, predicated upon a charge that the recitals of the answer do not constitute a defense to the plaintiff’s cause, of . action. Omitting the portions .of these pleadings which are immaterial to the issue before us, it appears that on November 30, 1928, the plaintiff sustained an industrial injury while in the employ of one who, together with himself, was subject to the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act; on January 11,1929, he filed with the Commission a claim for compensation; upon the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chebot v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reed v. HunterOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Goss v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API