Meaney v. State Industrial Accident Commission
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] IN BANC.
The respondent, Jack J. Meaney, moves to dismiss the appeal of the appellant, State Industrial Accident Commission, on three grounds:
First: That appellant has neither filed nor served an abstract of record herein as required by law and the rules of this court, at any time or at all.
Second: That appellant has neither filed, prepared, nor submitted a bill of exceptions nor a transcript of evidence prior to filing and serving brief of appellant, at any…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chebot v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Jones v. ConnOregon Supreme Court · 1901
- State v. ChaseOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Butterfield v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1924
- Williams v. Pacific Surety Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1912
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Williams v. RaganOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- Bratt v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1925
- Silbaugh v. Guardian Building & Loan Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1940
- State Ex Rel. Meaney v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1925
- Twin Falls Bank & Trust Co. v. City Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.