N.Y., C. St. L. Rd. Co. v. Van Dorp.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
Plaintiff’s car was a 1924 model Ford sedan. There is evidence tending to show that no bell nor whistle was sounded as the train approached the crossing and, as the engine of the automobile continued to run, the inference arises that the sound made by an automobile of that age and make would drown the ordinary noise made by the approach of a train so that the driver would' have great difficulty in hearing it.
Interrogatories were submitted to the jury at the request of defendant and the jury found by its answers thereto that the engineer did not blow the whistle and ring the bell as required…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Napier v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
3Cited by7 opinions
- Franklin v. NowakOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
- Gibbons v. Baltimore & Ohio Rd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1952
- Brown v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1952
- Union Pacific Railroad v. Motive Equipment, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
- Sturgell v. Detroit, Toledo & Ironton RailroadOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.