Legal Opinion

Franklin v. Nowak

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 23, 1935PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By CARPENTER, J.

In the trial court the defendant in error, William A. Nowak, who will be referred to herein as plaintiff, recovered a verdict and judgment for $9,500.from the plaintiffs in error, Walter S. Franklin et al, as receivers of The Ann Arbor Railroad Company, who will be called defendant herein. To reverse this judgment, this proceeding in error was instituted.

About 6:30 A. M., January 27, 1932, a collision occurred between an automobile owned and driven by plaintiff, who was then thirty-one years old, and a locomotive of the defendant at a grade crossing where the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Napier v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Erie R. v. WeinsteinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
  5. N.Y., C. St. L. Rd. Co. v. Van Dorp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Smith v. Southern Railroad Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
  2. Smith v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  3. Brown v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1952
  4. Icsman, Admr. v. N.Y.C. Rd. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. Loos v. Wheeling & Lake Erie Ry. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API