Legal Opinion

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Rose

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 11, 1933No. 23204PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMeNEILL, J.

This is an original action to review an order and award by the State •Industrial Commission, entered November '27, 1931, and corrected November 28, 1931, whereby the respondent, Loma Thigpen, was awarded compensation for temporary total disability for which the petitioner W. W. Rose and the Maryland Casualty as his insurance carrier, wore held liable.

It is conceded that the respondent, Loma Thigpen, sustained a compensable injury under the Workmen’s Compensation Law on August 15, 1930, while working as a “roughneck” in the drilling of an oil and gas well. A pipe rack broke causing a pipe to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. O. K. Boiler & Welding Co. v. Minnetonka Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Municipal Paving Co. v. HerringSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. WB Johnston Grain Company v. SelfSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  2. Campbell Oil Co. v. ElledgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Andrews Mining & Milling Co. v. RhodesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  4. Little v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Thurman v. SchlotzhauerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API