Legal Opinion
Thurman v. Schlotzhauer
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 27, 1934No. 25017PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtBusby, J.
This is an original action instituted in this court in which the petitioners, John M. Thurman and the Maryland Casualty Company, seek to vacate an order of the State Industrial Commission entered on the 19 th day of August, 1933, awarding compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act to respondent W. C- Schlotzhauer.
Hereafter the petitioners, John M. Thurman and Maryland Casualty Company, will be respectively designated as employer and insurance carrier, and the respondent W. C. Schlotzhauer as claimant.
Petitioner John M. Thurman was the owner of a planing mill in the city of Pawhuska.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Barnsdall Refining Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Trustees of Masonic Lodge of Elk City v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Southwestern Bridge & Culvert Co. v. SullengerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. McNeillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
3Cited by1 opinion
- Nelson v. DaughertySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960