Legal Opinion
Seidenberg v. New Mexico Board of Medical Examiners
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided March 10, 1969No. 8720PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TACKETT, Justice.
These consolidated causes are before us on an appeal by the Board of Medical Examiners, hereinafter referred to as the “Board,” which, after a very lengthy hearing, revoked the licenses of both appellees to practice medicine in the State of New Mexico.
The charges and hearings were conducted under the provisions of the Uniform Licensing Act, §§ 67-26-1 through 67-26-28, N.M.S.A., 1953 Comp.
Appellees appealed the decision of the Board to the District Court of Santa Fe County, the Honorable J. V. Gallegos, by designation, presided. After considering the record of the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Board of Medical Examiners v. StewardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Brinkley v. HassigCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Deaconess Hospital v. Washington State Highway CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- Asplund v. AlaridNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
- NJ State Bd. of Optometrists v. NemitzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State Board of Control v. Johnson Ranches, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- Keller v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
- Bennion v. Utah State Board of Oil, Gas & MiningUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- McDaniel v. New Mexico Board of Medical ExaminersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
- Wickersham v. New Mexico State Board of EducationNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.