Legal Opinion
Wickersham v. New Mexico State Board of Education
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided January 16, 1970No. 384PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Judge.
The Local Board (Jal Board of Education) refused to re-employ a tenure teacher (Harold W. Wickersham). The State Board (State Board of Education) affirmed the Local Board’s decision. The teacher appeals directly to this court. Section 77-8-17, N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 11, pt. 1). The teacher contends there is a lack of substantial evidence to support the decision not to re-employ him. In addition, he claims the State Board’s decision is arbitrary, unreasonable, unlawful and capricious. Under this claim he attacks the fairness of the proceedings before each of the Boards.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Tapia v. Panhandle Steel Erectors CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Beaumont, Sour Lake & Western Railway Co. v. BeaumontSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Llano, Inc. v. Southern Union Gas CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- State v. ThompsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Jones v. Employment Services Division of the Human Services DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Brininstool v. New Mexico State Board of EducationNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- Kaiser Steel Corp. v. Property Appraisal DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
- Board of Education v. New Mexico State Board of EducationNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- Fort Sumner Municipal School Board v. ParsonsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.