Legal Opinion

Towne Place Condo. Ass'n v. Phila. Indem. Ins. Co.

District Court, E.D. Illinois

Decided January 11, 2018No. 17 C 1561PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jeffrey Cole, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The parties in this insurance coverage case, who are also counsel in the case before Judge Feinerman, 17 C 1995, have a dispute about the discoverability of a very substantial number of emails. The parties have agreed that the ruling here is applicable to both cases.

The defendant's position is that its claim of privilege under the attorney-client (or in some instances, work product) privilege insulates the objected to documents from discovery. The plaintiff, with equal vigor, questions the assertion of privilege. The controversy initially resulted…

2Cases cited80 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Monco v. Zoltek Corp.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. W. Bend Mut. Ins. Co. v. Zurich Am. Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. American Council of The Blind of Metropolitan Chicago v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
  4. Ansur America Insurance Company v. BorlandDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2023
  5. Bankdirect Capital Finance, LLC v. Capital Premium Financing, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API