Legal Opinion

McKeever v. Eaton

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided April 21, 1934No. 3379, 3380PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, District Judge.

These are two actions brought to recover an alleged excess of income and profits taxes paid by the British American Manufacturing Company for the years 1918 and 1919.

On June 14, 1919, the taxpayer filed its income and profits tax return for the year 1918, disclosing a tax liability which, with interest, aggregated $42,291.38, which sum was paid in installments from March 19, 1919, to January 19, 1920. For the year 1919 the taxpayer filed its return on March 15, 1920, showing a net income of $1,769.97, and no taxes were paid for this year.

On March 17, 1923, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Williamsport Wire Rope Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Bemis Bro. Bag Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. United States v. Henry Prentiss & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Heiner v. Diamond Alkali Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Heiner, Collector of Internal Revenue, v. Diamond Alkali Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnston-Crews Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1941
  2. Con P. Curran Printing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936
  3. S. W. Flower Co. v. DenmanDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1936
  4. Staton v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API