Con P. Curran Printing Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
GREEN, Judge.
The plaintiff seeks to recover an alleged overassessment and overpayment of its income and excess profit taxes for the year 1920. One of the defenses made is that these taxes were levied and collected by a special assessment made by the Commissioner under sections 327 and 328 of the Revenue Act of 1918 (40 Stat. 1093), and it is insisted that the courts are without jurisdiction to review his action.
Plaintiff made a return for the year 1920 and paid its tax accordingly. In 1925 an examination was made of plaintiff’s return by a revenue agent and an additional tax recommended of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stange v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Williamsport Wire Rope Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Heiner v. Diamond Alkali Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Heiner, Collector of Internal Revenue, v. Diamond Alkali Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Central Iron & Steel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Johnston-Crews Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1941