Legal Opinion

Heiner, Collector of Internal Revenue, v. Diamond Alkali Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 13, 1933No. Nos. 476—478PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Roberts

These cases present the question whether, where the' Commissioner of Internal Revenue has granted special assessments of profits taxes pursuant to § 328 of the Revenue Act of 1918 (40 Stat. 1093), a court, in an action for a refund, may recalculate the taxpayer’s net income .and recompute the tax by applying to the corrected net income the rate per cent, used by the Commissioner in his computation of the tax.

The Alkali Company filed returns for income and profits taxes for 1918 and 1919 and paid the tax shown to be due. The Commissioner proposed certain changes in income and capital as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Williamsport Wire Rope Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. GUR Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
  2. Schram v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  3. Heiner v. Diamond Alkali Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Capital Warehouse Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1947
  5. Cleveland Automobile Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API