Legal Opinion
Harris v. Harris
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided March 16, 1949No. 16577PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Candler, Justice.
1. Rule 26 of the Rules of the Superior Courts (Code, Ann. Supp., § 24-3326) provides that “The service of any notice, process, motion, rule or order by the court on the attorney of record for any party to á cause pending in any court in this State shall be deemed sufficient service.” The provisions of this rule are applicable only after a defendant has been properly served and brought into court and employed an attorney to represent him. Beebe v. Smith, 76 Ga. App. 391 (46 S. E. 2d, 212).
2. While a proceeding to enforce an alimony judgment by attachment for contempt is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Girtman v. GirtmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Goodrum v. GoodrumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Bilbo v. BilboSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- Beebe v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Pace v. BergquistSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Barnes v. TantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
- Ginsberg v. GinsbergDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
- Moody v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Connell v. ConnellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
- Anthony v. AnthonySupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.