Bilbo v. Bilbo
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.
1. Pleas to the jurisdiction must be made in person, and,, when relied on, be pleaded specially unless want of jurisdiction appears on the face of the proceeding, in which ease it may be taken advantage of on motion. Civil Code (1910), § 5665.
2. A plea to the jurisdiction, when no want of jurisdiction appears on the face of the petition, is a dilatory plea; and it will not be considered unless filed at the first term, made in person, and sworn to. Civil Code (1910), § 5641; Smith v. Rawson, 61 Ga. 208; Hall v. Tiedeman, 141 Ga. 602 (81 S. E. 868).
3. Where on November 15, 1927, a wife…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hall v. TiedemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- Smith v. RawsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
- Hunter-Benn & Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
3Cited by19 opinions
- Haygood v. HaygoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Thomas v. LambertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Connell v. ConnellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- Goodrum v. GoodrumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.