Moody v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Judge.
1. The order adjudging appellant in contempt of court and consequent sentence shows on its face that it is based on two findings of contumacious conduct: failure to appear as directed by a subpoena and appearing in a courtroom while under the influence of alcohol. We consider these findings separately and in inverse order. The court, on conflicting evidence, had a right to determine that the witness was temporarily incapacitated and that this state stemmed from alcohol rather than drugs. Her appearance in that condition in the courtroom, however, was not voluntary but resulted…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
- Garland v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Norman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Farmer v. HoltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Martin v. WatersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Spruell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Hayes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- In Re McLartyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.